The ideologization of the Bolivarian Government has not only taken Riverbed in attempts to establish school programs with fundamental basis in the history of Venezuelan caudillos that sowed terror and authority in times past in the Venezuela yesterday, trying to throw to oblivion the democratic story that formed in this country over the years. Similarly attempts to force placed the slogan for fatherland, socialism or death instead of slogans of civics in schools. This occurs in Venezuela, dear readers but the participation of citizens has medium delayed the attempt of Mr. Chavez penetrate into the minds of children the motto fatherland, socialism or death. But this open mouth is to position the dear reader actions that the Bolivarian Venezuela is running at the level of State control, not only on the ideological side but in the economy with a series of actions that would be dragging the country into a kind of land of uncertainty for investment. Is by no means cost-effective perform some action of investment, because it doesn’t matter either cooperate or not with the Chavez government, there will always be the risk that the Government will again against.

For example the cases of cement company Cemex (Mexico) and the Siderurgica del Orinoco (italiano-argentina) which gave contributions in social matters, and are still being expropriated of their investments in the country. With an outlay of US $836,93 billion, the administration of Hugo Chavez, through Pdvsa, acquired control of 92,98% of the shares of Electricidad de Caracas, operated with maximum efficiency by private sector company. Only expected that with this measure the Government is capable of maintaining excellence within the electric company that until now maintained for the benefit of users. He also nationalized CANTV, company that provides fixed and mobile telephony services, is the largest company in the country’s telecommunications and the only one that has been present in the New York market.

Having the concept of social responsibility is only a preliminary step towards the social effectiveness of the company. It is important, however, because it is the value that gives entrepreneurs a solid basis for social action. Likewise, it is philosophy that justifies the business participation in the community, but the philosophy by itself is incomplete. It must be followed by effective social action. Therefore, necessary to take into account social responses to talk of social responsibility. In accordance with what you mention Carroll (1999), the concept of corporate social responsibility has had a long history. However, it is in the last 50 years has been formally documented this issue through investigations that have focused mostly on developed countries. So it is that this research, in part, fill spaces that have not been studied and nor investigated.

Another point of view raises social responsibility means trying to respond to the expectations of the community to help create a better society. According to Thomas Donaldson, enterprises and society have written a Social contract, where each party has rights as well as obligations to the other party (Madsen, 1990). Of course, not all persons interested in social responsibility will agree that there is a moral obligation on companies spend resources to help solve social problems. In his classic article, the social responsibility of companies is to increase its profits, Milton Friedman States that the solution of social problems is the Government’s task, in such a way that the managers who spend money in social activities are acting irresponsibly (Madsen, 1990). The above, not to say that utilities are not important. The utilities are to business what is the oxygen for humans, says Andres Marcelo Sada, former director Cellulose and derivatives (CYDSA), important Mexican company. A company cannot exist if it doesn’t generate utilities, but this is not the only reason for its existence.