Fernando Goi will be chosen president of the General Meeting of the Principality. The PSOE will finally support the candidate of the PP, leaving it go to FACE. The deputy of the PP Fernando Goi will be chosen east Wednesday president of the General Meeting of the Principality of Asturias in the plenary session of constitution of the autonomic Camera with the votes of his group and of the Socialist. This agreement leaves outside the Table of the regional Parliament to Asturias Forum (FACE) and IU-Los Green. The deputy of the PSOE Fernando Flagstone, in declarations to journalists before entering the chamber, has explained that to their party the option of which presides over the Parliament the PP has seemed him " more conveniente" that if made FACE, because they did not want that he agrees with the party that the regional Government will preside over. " The option by the Popular Party seems better to us than the other alternative posible" , Lastra has said, that it has clarified that " it is not that " is an agreement; , but there was " to choose between the different options, or president of Forum or the PP; it will be of the PP". One hour before the plenary session began of constitution of the General Meeting FACE reiterated – after last night failing the negotiations a supply according to the PP for all the legislature, that it included to support to the Popular Party for the parliamentary Presidency and the support of the PP to Francisco Alvarez-Helmet for the Presidency of the regional Government. The age table that will direct the constitution of the Parliament has been designated spent the 12,05 hours and will take possession sixteen deputies from FACE, fifteen of the PSOE, ten of PP and four of IU-LV. Source of the news: The PP will obtain the Presidency of the Asturian Parliament with the support of the PSOE
To have understanding during the reading, the world knowledge must be activated. It is subdivided in: structuralized knowledge (when commanded) and partial (it includes what it is previsible in the situations). This knowledge is called project. The project determines, in part, our expectations on the natural order of the things. The reading is not an act to decipher or to guess graphical signals, and yes an interlocution process, is the meeting with the author who if of the one for the written word. From there the importance of the reading search significaes consisting from the reading of many other texts, becoming deeper its understanding of books and the life. Reading does not consist the mere one to pass the eyes in the line. It goes beyond, is: technique is relation between reader and text; it demands intellectual acuidade, sensitivity, experience; it involves knowledge and understanding of the words chores, express ideas, association of meanings, election of ugly association.
Evaluation of what creation is read. It reads to learn it is necessary one criticizes and systematic, that only can be acquired through practises. For Oliveira (2000) the process to read implies in the decoding? to translate the signals graphical: inteleco – says respect to the meaning of what it was chore, interpretation? apprehension of the ideal in the relations between text and the context; application of the content. Literature, art of the writings, amongst all the possibilities of the reading, most pleasant and richer. Through it we make contact with distinct time, distinct universes, people whom if they had liberated of ' ' law of morte' ' , producing texts that still re-echo in sensitivity and in the intelligence of all those that if interest for the life and the human being. When the reader if transforms into active citizen, is a source of significaes and implications that go being discovered to each reading.
The bible tells that Jesus here in the land was: lover, patient, fidiciary office, just, rectum (…) is possible to be perfect. the ethics for its abrangncia, disclose that its proper arguments become empty for so ample abrangncia; the physical and mental space does not obtain to hold so vast quarrels. The reflections now if come back toward the attitudes and the concentrations of several to know, in search begin of it absolute of the behavior, based specifically on the religion: soon, thoughts of great theoreticians as, Scrates, Aristotle and Plato; in the direction to take the divisions ethical and its understanding being had relevance the theology: of a side the infidelity of the life human being is to cultuar the God; in as the aspect the pleasure is not a good nor one badly, In these perspectives, is firmed doctrines that place the happiness in the center of the ethical concerns, pointing ideal factors without, however to forget that it always has the necessity of comment of the reality circundamente our return; disclosing for intermediary of the good the praiseworthy attitudes before the society, that through the proper man integrally, if well to act will have the allegiance to convince others by means of that to present, immediately afterwards, the author presents the wisdom in that one somebody whose potential guides to it to decide on definitive subjects in view of the logic, the reason. For Plato this is the highest point well; already to Aristotle the empiricist comes to determine and to involve all the too much aspects of the life. In the context of the religiosidade and ethics he has had confusions, some thinkers still search to universalizar the concepts that if relate to the subject, being believed that the principles must be the same one for all at the same time; on the other hand they present that the trend of modernity values yes; the pleasures> in detriment of the reason and common-sense; the praticidade to considered the moral and ethical values until then, suffocating the moral and, at the same time causing concern concernente the ethics in this direction.