Is positive, that the students from Goias by means of their demonstrations achieved a success, because they obtain a reduction in the Fares. With the rise in prices of transport in the two largest cities of the country, Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the demonstrations have grown. Virtually all demonstrations were disproportionately suppressed by the military police of the respective States. This happened with tear gas, non-lethal weapons and the arrest of many protesters. Parallel to these events, the largest TV station Globo gives a picture of a movement marked by violence. There is talk, scenes of conflict by vandalism and devastation shows the transmitter without the proper contextualization of the demonstration. Nissans opinions are not widely known. This has given rise to a general sense of injustice and resulted in an even greater support among the population for the protesters.
The repressive measures of the police show equally unexpected effects. The reinforcement of the repression seems to multiply the number of people on the street. The demonstrations were mainly about social networks organized. Facebook was the main tool for the dissemination and circulation of information. Different groups responsible for accepting information and disseminate among the demonstrators. You want to know, what is happening in the different regions of the country. A simultaneous connection between the various protests that take place daily, was produced in this way.
AnonimousBrasil is one of these pages and has more than a million visitors. The demonstrations are announced but not limited by social networks. In Rio de Janeiro, the demonstrators regularly organize discussions at the Institute for philosophy and Social Sciences (IFCS) and the Federal University (UFRJ) to discuss about the focus and direction of the demonstrations and to decide. Results in the social networks will be announced in a row.
In article 30 ABS. 1 set of 2 BVerfGG is to behold, the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court in writing to Word that, to justify and those judges who have worked with her, is to sign. Article 30 ABS. 3, does that say all decisions to announce the parties are. To reject a provision which allows the Constitutional Court according to 93d BVerfGG only for work relief and relief to constitutional complaints without justification is indeed non-existent.
The BVerfGG is, and this is here once very clearly that no instrument to the work relief or relief from there make people, but should serve the litigants as all laws. It is therefore obviously not speculation, the decisions rejected the Federal Constitutional Court without explanation until 2008 no validity in law are, because is not comprehensible, who has rejected these decisions, is thus not assured that the complaints were ever presented to a judge and reliefs and consulting secrets of the constitutional judges are advanced and represent no rechtswirsame form a decision. The complainant receives only a print copy of the decision and can recognize the signatures of the judge only in printed form. In the case of the constitutional complaint 1 BvR 3282/08 added yet, which was communicated to the complainant that the constitutional complaint is unfounded after reading the page 1 of a 15seitigen complaint. Only the file number of the angefriffenen decisions were included on the first page of the complaint and his desire listed to submit a constitutional complaint. Also this unique of letter of the Federal Constitutional Court is the editorial, so to assume is that upon receipt of all rejected complaints without grounds get a stamp post office Court, business rooms and then Presidential Council and then return to the sender. Extensive files views, at least until four instances may arise or read complaints typefaces is absent after three obviously.