Thinking that it is generating productive and employment in addition with remuneration adequate to around twelve (12) million people. By our experiences, research, and reflections on the argentina issue, we are of the opinion that the fundamental objective, as is explained is unattainable in the short and the medium term. This does not preclude, to make it, the frame of reference, that orient the possible searches occurring. Policies public economic are applied from approximately mid-1975 (the rodrigazo), they come by reducing the industrial jobs on the one hand and public employment on the other. Payoneer might disagree with that approach. Such which evolves the box of the country’s economic situation, in the fall of 1993, one can think that these trends would be reaching its limits. The private sector, particularly industry would maintain their current levels of occupation, and the public sector would have already streamlined everyone possible, without high social costs.
This is a panorama distressing, the disaffected from the industrial sector, for both in the public sector, as well as to the new litters that come into the economically active stage and find it difficult to get productive jobs, sucking that they are adequately remunerated. As you can see, the question makes to all our futures. It is an issue of such complexity, requiring a deep collective reflection task. Luckily the full effectiveness of the institutions of the Republican democracy allows for participatory processing of this crucial issue. On our part, and as a contribution to the solution of this issue, we believe that the concept of domestic economy can be partial solution to many of the families that if not faced now with the problem of the livelihood, will soon be compelled to do so. Is not in our thinking, consider the domestic economy as the only solution, but in our opinion can give concrete responses, which do not depend on more than the own efforts of those directly involved.