Protecting the rights of car owners in the fight against corruption in government bodies and local self-government is a priority of Russia's domestic policy. Forum is the leading electrotransport.ru avtopravozaschitnym Internet forum by the number of successfully won cases, the scope and objectivity of the information contained. Founded in 2008, Russian lawyer Yury Yurevich Shulipa in order to unify and coordinate efforts of lawyers, scientists, entrepreneurs profiled orientation, as well as ordinary car owners to help to protect the rights and lawful interests of citizens in the area of traffic strengthening the rule of law, establishment of civil society and rule of law. The forum has unmatched exclusive sections devoted to the registration of electrical, as well as serial adapted vehicle, assist drivers complaining to the European Court of Human Rights is the judicial statistics. With the support of the board of trustees of the Union elektromobilistov Russia.
Make an appointment to Yuri Shulipa! tel / fax: 8-499-500-11-26 from 09.00 to 18.00, 125009, Moscow, st. Tverskaya, 20 / 1 page 1 Resolution issued on inadmissible evidence. Recognizing as evidence from the traffic police report IDPS 10. 06. 2009 l.
d. 8-9, the magistrate failed to recognize that by virtue of Section 109 instructions for records management in the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation (approved by order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia from 04.12.2006 987): – "In reviewing the documents head of internal affairs body determines by resolution the Executive (a division or officer), and deadlines. The resolution should be concise, contain and order nature of the execution of the document, as well as names and initials of the perpetrators, manager's signature and date. The resolution is written on a document separate sheet or on a special form. " A report on the data there is no resolution heads of departments, which are addressed to and information about registration in the division of traffic police, that equates them with the usual paper. The above facts call into question legality, validity and accuracy of processing these documents. The document, which has no resolution, the head of the structural unit, which it is addressed and registration information in Traffic Police Division has no legal force, and therefore, by virtue of Part 3. 26.2. Administrative Code, can not be put to the court for its decision. Information about when and under what circumstances were produced these documents are not available. Considering the above,.